Simone谁能帮围绕“Should animal experimentation be continued?"的专题帮写500字左右的英文文章~谢~急
的有关信息介绍如下：
2、Animal experiments are not cruel. Agree or disagree？
分析：依旧是老题的变形，但突出了cruel，所以不要写错
Beginning：
Many years – conservationists and animal rights groups- arguing that –animal experiments are not cruel – I agree/disagree – following reasons:
Body：
Reason1---agree:
topic sentence: Animal experiments are
justified to relieve human suffering论述：the reduction of human suffering is our first priority and the prevention of animal suffering or death is secondary to that (although still important). So that if there is a decent（following moral standards that are acceptable to society） chance that an experiment will result in an important medical breakthrough that will reduce human suffering and death then it is justifiable to allow animal suffering. Animal experimentation is the (sometimes distasteful（unpleasant or morally offensive）) means to much greater ends.
Digress:
topic sentence: Animal experiments are cruel because of the animals’ suffering
Animals have the right to be treated as beings of value in themselves, not as the means to human ends; To infect monkeys with the AIDS virus or to expose rodents（啮齿动物） to toxic chemicals and radiation（[辐射） is simply not acceptable, whatever the supposed benefits.
Reason2—agree
topic sentence: to prevent animal suffering, in practice it is possible (and absolutely right) to keep animal suffering to an absolute minimum.
Animal experimenters should aspire to the highest levels of animal welfare in their laboratories, using anaesthetics（麻醉学） wherever possible and keeping animals in clean, comfortable, and healthy conditions. In short（＝to sum up/to summarize/in summary）, it is possible to experiment on animals without being cruel to animals.
disagree：
topic sentence: In practice, as everyone knows, animals are not routinely（if something is routinely done, it is done as a normal part of a process or job例行公事地） treated well by animal experimenters.
Apart from the fact that millions of animals die each year in experiments, others are often not adequately anaesthetised and are abused by handlers and experimenters. It is idealistic to suppose that this will ever stop as long as society endorses vivisection（the practice doing medical or scientific tests on live animals活体解剖）.
End:
Many people think –animal experiments = cruel, barbaric – I do (not) agree ……
2 ，动物实验是不是残忍。同意或不同意？
分析：依旧是老题的变形，但突出了残忍，所以不要写错
开始：
多年-保育人士和动物权益团体-辩称动物实验，是不是残忍-我同意/不同意-理由如下：
机构：
reason1 ---同意：
主题句：动物实验
理由，以减轻人类苦难的论述：减少人类痛苦的是我们的首要任务，并防止动物痛苦或死亡是次要的， （虽然仍然很重要） 。所以说，如果有一个像样的（以下道德标准，是可以接受社会）的机会，这是一个实验，并将通过一项重要的医学突破，这将减少人类痛苦和死亡，那么，它的做法是合理的，让动物的痛苦。动物实验是（有时distasteful （不愉快或道义上的进攻） ）的手段，以更大的目的。
题外话：
主题句：动物实验是残酷的，因为该动物的痛苦
动物都有权被视为人的价值本身，而不是以此为手段来人类完;感染猴艾滋病病毒或揭露啮齿动物（啮齿动物）有毒化学品和辐射（ [辐射） ，是根本不接受的，无论假定利益。
reason2 -同意
主题句：为防止动物痛苦，在实践中是有可能的（而且绝对正确） ，以保持动物的痛苦降到最低。
动物实验者应追求最高水平的动物福利，在他们的实验室，使用麻醉药（麻醉学）尽可能保持动物在干净，舒适，健康的条件。总之（ =总结/总结/摘要） ，是有可能对实验动物被残忍的动物。
不同意：
主题句：在实践中，大家都知道，动物也没有惯常（如果事情是经常做的，这是一种正常的过程的一部份或工作例行公事地）善待动物实验者。
除了上述事实，即以百万计的动物，每年死于在实验中，其他人往往不能充分麻醉，并受到虐待，由操作者和实验者。它是理想的假定，这将永不放弃，只要社会认可，解剖（实践做医学或科学试验，对活畜活体解剖） 。
为此：
很多人认为动物实验=残忍，野蛮-我（不）同意… …
